We store cookies, you can get more info from our privacy policy.

Disney Infinity: Good Idea, Bad Idea

Boba Fett and Emperor Palpatine

by Becky Hollada and Kimberly Keller - December 19, 2013, 8:32 pm EST

Oh right, they own that now too.

Boba Fett (Good Idea) – by Kimberly Keller

Disney’s latest acquisition of Star Wars has left the House of Mouse with quite a few merchandising opportunities. Whether you’re a fan of this development or not, it’s hard to ignore Disney’s already close ties with the franchise in the past: dressing Mickey and the gang in Star Wars costumes, modeling a whole section of Walt Disney World’s Hollywood Studios park like the movies, and even featuring an ad where Darth Vader explores Disneyland for the first time. Even though it’s Christmas time, and putting the Star Wars Christmas Special jokes aside, let’s take a break from the eggnog and look to the future of our favorite galactic saga.

Of course, with new acquisitions comes new merchandising opportunities, and, as Disney Interactive VP of product development Bill Roper hinted at back in April, Disney Infinity will soon see its share of galactic visitors. There will undoubtedly be figures for characters like Luke, Leia, Vader, and my favorite, Han Solo, but let’s look at someone a little harder to put Mickey ears on: the ruthless bounty hunter Boba Fett. It’s been rumored that Disney has a Boba Fett standalone movie in the works taking place sometime in between the original films. This puts the popular bounty hunter in the forefront for Disney Infinity.


Hopefully he can be featured without the seriously anti-climatic death...

Boba Fett would actually fit in great in the Disney Infinity universe if used right. Feeling a little dark today? Slap that figure onto the scanner and load him up. This isn’t like other villains featured in the game who come off as silly or playful, this is a character that is going to look cold and menacing no matter where you put him. This is an opportunity to play with real, uncaring evil. Disney has always said the possibilities should be “infinite” for their open world game, making it into a place where anyone can let their imagination run wild in the Toy Box. Well, what if your dream is to rule over this silly whimsical land and work outside the laws of friendship and fun? Boba Fett fills in this void almost too perfectly.

I can just picture it now, Boba’s dark visor looking over the land he now controls has he cradles his gun. True, he has no ambitions to rule in the films, he’s more of a survivalist really, but this is a guy who commands attention, even from Darth Vader himself. He works only for himself and will do anything to achieve his monetary goals, but in Disney Infinity I’m in charge, and I say Mr. Fett over here is going to help me rule a kingdom, sarlaccs be damned.

Here’s an interesting conundrum, which version will Disney choose? Badass or New Zealand? The prequels caused Lucas to ditch the famously cruel voice of Jason Wingreen in the Special Edition of the films and replaced him with the accented voice of the prequel’s Temuera Morrison (Jango Fett) to fit in with his clone backstory. (The obvious solution, of course, would’ve been to simply cast someone who sounded like Boba Fett in the first place, but I guess that’s ancient history now.) In an interesting move, Disney actually used the original version of Boba’s voice for their highly popular Star Tours ride, completing ignoring the new canon. This then begs the question: what will Disney do with the character now that they own the franchise?


Emperor Palpatine (Bad Idea) – by Becky Hollada

What’s a discussion about Disney without their latest acquisition? Although Star Wars has been associated with Disney for a long time, they have only owned it since recently and it’s hard to imagine that Disney will completely overlook it when considering characters for Disney Infinity.

Since Star Wars takes place throughout an entire galaxy (far, far away), there are plenty of characters to choose from and no shortage of bad ones (Jar Jar Binks anyone?). At first, this supreme bad guy and lord of the Sith may not necessarily seem like a bad choice for a Disney Infinity boss, but there are many other, better choices.


Seriously not a healthy look.

Emperor Palpatine tops the Star Wars list of evil jerks. He has no problem killing people, he is a tyrant who weaseled his way into power and created an empire out of a republic, and those lightning powers are an awesome way to slowly, painfully kill someone. So that basically means that there isn’t a soul alive who wouldn’t love to kill him. But while Palpatine is all sorts of evil, his primary strength comes from his ability to manipulate people, rather than physical strength. His lightning attack is pretty lethal, but that’s all he’s got. Palpatine relies heavily on his attack dog, Vader, to protect him from an outright assault. He doesn’t even have a lightsaber in the later trilogy leaving him pretty vulnerable to close range attack. In terms of a boss in a real-time battle setting, this is a pretty big chink in his armor.

Aside from all that, the Emperor has one more big issue. He’s old. Like pretty darn old by the later trilogy. This means movement isn’t going to be his strong suit. That much is obvious by the fact that he spends most of his time in the movies looking menacing from a chair. This reduces a lot of what he can do in terms of a game like Disney Infinity.

While the Emperor might be about to work with some creative development to make up for his limitations, there are much better options in the Star Wars universe for characters or bosses.

Images

Talkback

CericOctober 03, 2013

294,000 units.  Double Standard on Success.

Alright on the article.

CericOctober 03, 2013

I think Winnie the Pooh be an ok edition.


Now Roger Rabbit on the other hand would be one of those great on paper but not in reality combinations.  While I think the characters themselves be a great fit.  I don't see how the stages for them would work.  A large portion of the charm of Who Framed Roger Rabbit is having that contrast between the Cartoon and Real world and between Now and Then.  They would need photo realistic characters and settings to play the straight man to do it right.  They have to be different then the actual Infinity Universe style to get the contrast right.

BJWanlundOctober 03, 2013

YES to Roger Rabbit!  What about The Three Caballeros?  That technically would include a member of the Fab Five (or Six depending on your perspective), but hey, it'd certainly be interesting.

CericOctober 03, 2013

Lets really dig.  The Three Little Pigs.  They had their own series. 

MetalMario2October 03, 2013

None of these will be coming. The game ought to be called "Pixar Infinity: Featuring Johnny Depp".

CericOctober 04, 2013

To be honest Pixar properties are probably the easiest to port since they already have 3D models to start with.

Spak-SpangOctober 07, 2013

Actually Roger Rabbit would work if you only had Toon Town.  Toon Town was great and super Creepy...but you would have to get that sugary cell shaded world just perfect, and it would be a careful balance between annoying and brilliant. 



MetalMario2October 09, 2013

I actually binge-watched the Tinkerbell movies on Netflix on a day that I felt particularly bored and shiftless, and I've got to admit, they weren't that bad. Strictly kid's stuff, but not that bad. Disney is doing a good job of developing the character's genesis gradually over the course of this series of films. In the third film, they explained why Tinkerbell can't speak to humans using her normal voice, and the next film in development is supposed to feature a young Captain Hook (before Peter Pan cuts off his hand, of course).

WahOctober 09, 2013

Lucario ::)

MetalMario2October 25, 2013

Yeah, "The Black Cauldron" sucked.

UncleBobRichard Cook, Guest ContributorOctober 25, 2013

Song of the South.

MetalMario2October 25, 2013

They could actually do that if they left out Uncle Remus and the Tar Baby. I mean, it worked for Splash Mountain.

TeaHeeOctober 25, 2013

I didn't hate "The Black Cauldron" but I was also completely enamored with the book series it was based on back in junior high. Following much of the logic put forward against it, I would have to guess that "The Sword and the Stone" would also fall in the bad idea list.

KeyBillyOctober 27, 2013

I didn't realize that Black Couldron was so hated.  I saw it a few years ago and liked it a lot.  It has a unique tone and style that captured my imagination.  I don't plan on getting Infinity, but maybe it would work to make statues/buildings/mountains/weapons/etc. for the lesser known franchises, similar to trophies in SSB.

Jasae BushaeOctober 28, 2013

Having read the books the black cauldron is based upon, I can certainly say that the movie was worlds better by comparison and that a darker vibe would not have saved the film in the least.

And, I agree that it might not make the best of playsets for Infinity. As structured as that movie was, unless the playset was having you go through the plot of the film to detail, the creators would have to create some pretty new material (perhaps borrowing from other books in the original series?) which might be more work than they want to put in.
That said, if they did do it, it would not necesarily be a bad playset. The lone ranger playset received much much higher reviews than the film did and gets near universal praise for its approach despite the films mixed reaction. So if they were to tackle the black cauldron, they could probably make it work.


Though thinking on it, the black cauldron would actually make a pretty awesome kingdom hearts world. Given that settings penchant for telling the stories of movies over with the inclusion of kingdom hearts setting...They could simply give the horned king a cauldron that summons heartless and run the characters through a pretty solid world.


As for kim possible, I have to ask, what basis makes that series a good choice? They are already planning a phineas and ferb playset. They have the Incredibles already lined up. What could a kim possible playset offer that does not come off as a boring repeat of the already established playsets?
Lone Ranger tackled wild west
Incredibles did superheroes
Pirates did pirates
Monsters University did college life

The playsets at least for the first year or two should be trying to branch out and cover multiple genres instead of making a bunch of very similar playsets elsewise your just creating a game with tedium that is rereleasing the same content over and over.
Which would be bad for Kim Possible since as you said, it HAD its final season and its only getting older and further from public memory

TrekStyxNovember 04, 2013

I think the Kim Possible and her world of characters would be an awesome addition to Infinity.


It's true that The Incredibles already covers the superhero territory and Monsters U covers college/school life, but Kim Possible is NEITHER of these genres. She's a spy!


She's got gadgets, stealth, and acrobatics and fights evil all without the benefit of Mr. Incredible-esque strength. She's the Disney cartoon equivalent of Batman or James Bond, and the spy genre and martial arts action is something that is seriously fun and currently lacking in the current roster of Infinity swashbucklers and supers.


Plus a KP playset has great potential. If there's any doubt in your mind that her unique world of characters doesn't translate into a good gaming experience, check out the "Kim Possible: What's the Switch?" game from 2006. It is surprisingly addictive and even more surprising, incredibly challenging.


As for The Black Cauldron. It is indeed dated and doesn't work. While it may be true that something like The Lone Ranger got a playset that was more well received than its more polarizing film counterpart, that was also a modern, recent Disney property and one with Johnny "Captain Jack" Depp attached no less. Suffice it to say, The Lone Ranger deserved a second skin in gaming and Disney was rightly motivated to give it that chance.


Black Cauldron is old, irrelevant and didn't work for Disney even in its heyday. While the right group of developers might be able to fish through the source material and conjure up a fresh take on the story in game form, that would say more their own creativity than it would for The Black Cauldron as a deserving Infinity candidate.


Definitely proper good/bad ideas this week!

Tron, Flynn and Sark.


I have to disagree on Loki though—I prefer my Marvel, LucasFilm and Disney separate. If the line gets blurred, we may end up with Spider-Mickey and Darth Goofy, and I don't know if I want to live in that kind of world.

UncleBobRichard Cook, Guest ContributorDecember 06, 2013

You don't say....

http://www.geekrest.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Darth-Goofy.jpg

I'm not sure if I'll ever get this game, but if they came out with Wall-E, my wife would buy the figurines regardless.

azekeDecember 07, 2013

Quote from: ballisticmedicine

Kill me. Now.

I know right?..

They're smearing all stinky SW business over our precious Goofy!..

Zombie Goofy in one of the latest Mickey Mouse shorts was so creepy

Got a news tip? Send it in!
Advertisement
Advertisement