Well, while it's a shame to see such a longstanding developer go under, I can't say I'm surprised. There was only so long they could keep going spitting out seemingly-identical and incredibly niche Rune Factory games (and only them, year after year).  I feel like Neverland never quite knew what to do with their other properties, and I've never understood why they let the sales of that crappy Lufia 2 DS remake dictate their decision to not support the Virtual Console.  Hopefully whoever picks apart their carcase puts Lufia 2 up on the VC.

Sad day.  Lufia 2 is one of the few games that I would gladly play on an endless loop, and I really enjoyed the DS game for what it was, but I never sported even a passing interest in Rune Factory.  So I'll have my fingers crossed as well that someone remembers to pull the Lufia franchise out from under whatever wobbly desk it's been propping up.

Sales of remakes should not dictate the viability of releasing a title on retro services. The pull of nostalgia is it's own sales boost and there are less resources used to re-release a title in it's original state.


I wonder who will carry on the Rune Factory series. All the talk about Nintendo needing to buy studios makes me think they could sweep in and save them. Combining Rune Factory/Harvest Moon style play with Animal Crossing has been on my mind lately.

Sad to see the studio going through hard times as their best Rune Factory game only recently was released in North America.


As for the Rune Factory series and Lufia series, I've read that those belong to Marvelous and Square-Enix (?) respectively and that Neverland was doing the legwork for the latest games in those series. Maybe Marvelous can help some of the staff if Rune Factory 5 is planned.

Never tried Lufia but Rune Factory was a good series.

I've never played any of their games, but I did recently buy Rune Factory 4. Given this news, I think I'll be more inclined to play it sooner.

I played Lufia 1 & 2 on an SNES emulator back in my pirating days. I liked them a lot. But the more recent titles never seemed to get the formula right.