"$266 Million, or more than one-third of advertising in games in 2009, will come from 'advergaming,' when advertisers create a game around a product rather than place their brands within a well-known title, according to Yankee Group senior analyst Mike Goodman at the Advertising In Games Forum."

And who the HELL is going to buy this? Seriously. The general public can be morons at the best of times but there's a limit to how far you can fool them. McDonalds Man isn't going to sell millions of copies.

That's what really bugs me about these predictions. They are predicting that we're all f*cking idiots like we're not going to notice when our games become riddled with ads. You can fool us for a little while but once you start releasing games that are advertisements people are going to start wising up. This is going to turn away people and not attract anyone so it's an idea that will eventually fail. People only tolerate ads when they either don't have to pay for what they're seeing (TV) or they have no choice because there aren't ad-free options (magazines). And unlike magazines, games don't make money based almost entirely on advertising revenue. With a magazine you have to have ads to make a profit. With games you don't so there will always be publishers (like Nintendo) that will offer ad-free games. No one will be forced to deal with ads so they won't. This would only work if they sold games at such a low price that ads were the sole source of profit and people were willing to deal with the ads for super-cheap videogames.

The way things are becoming so commercial and how publishers are getting so greedy I'm beginning to think that the idea of another crash isn't too farfetched. The longterm gaming fans are essentially being squeezed out in North America and the casuals don't have enough interest to keep the current industry as it is afloat. The current industry requires the business of both the casuals and the hardcore but the casuals can be easily distracted by the next big thing (ie: cellphone gaming could steal away the console casual market). The hardcore market will stick around the longest but the industry is largely targeting the mainstream which could jump ship at any moment. There are too many companies relying on the gaming "fad" to last longer than a fad should.

"$266 Million, or more than one-third of advertising in games in 2009, will come from 'advergaming,' when advertisers create a game around a product rather than place their brands within a well-known title, according to Yankee Group senior analyst Mike Goodman at the Advertising In Games Forum."

And who the HELL is going to buy this? Seriously. The general public can be morons at the best of times but there's a limit to how far you can fool them. McDonalds Man isn't going to sell millions of copies.

I'd like to know if this includes movie licenses...

Quote

---

McDonalds Man isn't going to sell millions of copies.

---

$266 Million, or more than one-third of advertising in games in 2009, will come from "advergaming," when advertisers create a game around a product rather than place their brands within a well-known title, according to Yankee Group senior analyst Mike Goodman at the Advertising In Games Forum.

err...

You know, I (and most every "gamer" and "casual gamer") detest the large majority of lisenced games... But at least, generally, there's occasionally a decent-good lisenced game released...

This scares the *crap* out of me... "The Adventures of Smokin' Joe Camel! You'll traverse the Egyptian Landscape to collect all ten packs of Joe's secret stash of full-flavored, ultra smooth Camel Cigarettes. You'll face all kinds of evil enemies like Soccor Moms, School Heath Department and Physical Education Teachers and Politicans all on your way to do battle the evil Surgeon General and discover the true, cool flavor of Camel Cigarettes! This game is MSRP $49.99 and is rated M for Mature!"

Quote

---

Originally posted by: Ian Sane


The way things are becoming so commercial and how publishers are getting so greedy I'm beginning to think that the idea of another crash isn't too farfetched.

---

This would only work if they sold games at such a low price that ads were the sole source of profit and people were willing to deal with the ads for super-cheap videogames.

This could be interesting... Would you pay $5 for a new Mario game where instead of Mushrooms and Feathers, Mario grabs Nestle's Crunch and Resee's Peanut Butter Cups - and the "unedited" version (with Mushrooms and Feathers) was sitting beside it for $45 more?

Well, that's it for the "It's only to make games more realistic" attitude.

You wouldn't see "McDonald's Man", you'd see a McDonald's on every corner in GTA and True Crime. And McDonald's bill boards in racing games. McDonald's hamburgers on people's desks. That sort of thing.

And here's my comment from the article:

What worries me is that if the revenue from product placement in games becomes high enough, it may cause many publishers to think twice about putting their money behind a game with a setting that won't accommodate product placement (remember folks, Link uses only the finest Port Orford Pre-Finished Cedar Arrows).

The other extreme would be that games might have products advertised during loading screens if they won't fit into the game itself. Obviously, that would be a travesty, but perhaps not enough of one to prevent it from happening. However, backlash from gamers and especially reviewers should help to keep anything like that from happening, but that will just exacerbate the problem of publishers shunning games that don't lend themselves to product placement.

"Would you pay $5 for a new Mario game where instead of Mushrooms and Feathers, Mario grabs Nestle's Crunch and Resee's Peanut Butter Cups"

Crunch and Reese are made by two different companies. Twice the revenue for Nintendo!

"I'd like to know if this includes movie licenses"

So would I. Usually a game has a movie licence to draw attention to the game but with the huge merchandising you see for films these days advertisers might view the licenced products as a way to draw attention to the movie. Or perhaps they're both seen as advertisments that draw attention to each other in a twisted circle of capitalism manipulation.

The way it's worded though it sounds like they meet in a board room as say "let's make a videogame to promote Pepsi" as opposed to "let's make a videogame to cash-in on the popularity of this licence."

Quote

---

Originally posted by: UncleBob
This would only work if they sold games at such a low price that ads were the sole source of profit and people were willing to deal with the ads for super-cheap videogames.

This could be interesting... Would you pay $5 for a new Mario game where instead of Mushrooms and Feathers, Mario grabs Nestle's Crunch and Resee's Peanut Butter Cups - and the "unedited" version (with Mushrooms and Feathers) was sitting beside it for $45 more?

---

Now folks, don't discount Ian's "McDonald Man" prophecy outright... Who remembers This AWESOME hit from 1992?

Hee hee! *raises hand*.

Well, There was the Noid game for the NES too

and what was that Skittles game that came out this generation? Darkened Skyes? I always wanted to try it..

I was thinking the same. That and Cool Spot.

God, I freakin' hate this. So very retarded. I'm glad to be riding with Nintendo, anyway. Of all the companies, they're least likely to give into this sort of thing.

Hey guys, remember when Pikmin 2 had tons of advertising? Good times

Did Nintendo actually get paid for Pikmin 2 product placement or did they put those products in themselves and then asked for permission to use the trademarks? There isn't anything wrong with having a real product in a game it just depends on the motive behind it. Putting it in to add realism is acceptable. Putting it in to act as an advertisement is bad. With Pikmin 2 I felt that the game benefitted from the real world products. It made it more interesting to see what Olimar thought of items we see in real life. The instant recognition by the player of the "treasures" was important for the feel of the game ie: Duracell batteries are very distinct looking and just using a generic battery probably wouldn't allow for an instant recognition.

If it was blatant advertising the game would specifically be about Olimar collecting Coke product related bottlecaps or something else as painfully obvious and insulting.

GTA: Vice city the best selling game fo all time at 6.5 million copies? (over Mario 64 at 6 million)?

1) North America only figures (Mario 64 killed VC worldwide - Japan people)

2) What the F*$&! Super Mario Bros 1 Sold 60 million copies worldwide (although half were packaged in the system) and Mario 3 sold 40 million! Are you telling me they sold less then 10% of their sales in the USA?

3) It's prob some marketing Bull%&$ to pretend gaming started with the PS2, because that's the most likley console to have ads in the games.

Thanks for pointing that out, David. Is NPD given license to revise history simply because they're the only ones with hard and fast numbers for North America? Of course SMB isn't an advertisement-friendly game, so I wouldn't expect any less from someone in the Advertising in Games Forum....

Somebody gag me. I've gone on record saying if this gets out of hand, I'll do retro gaming and never touch a 'current' gen console again. I was pretty angry, but not that I've simmered down, I'll wait until the industry crashes . When the proverbial smoke clears, I'll come out of the proverbial woodwork and start consuming 'current' games again. I wonder how many hardcore gamers will do the same thing? Any takers?

Yeah, NPD numbers are basically from the USA. I'm curious if they include Canada too? I've always wondered that.... Otherwise, if they did add up worldwide sales numbers, Nintendo would have a lot titles up there. But that would assume the press would start giving Nintendo respect .

Quote

---

So within 16 months all cell phones in the marketplace should be game capable.

---

Quote

---

Advertising in Games Forum was the first conference where advertisers, publishers and game makers will come together to outline the opportunities and challenges of ads in games, and explore together the most effective way to take advantage of games as a platform while benefiting the consumer.

---

I don't think ads in games will reduce the cost to the end user at all. Everyone is talking about how much more money it will cost to make a next-gen game. Having product placements can help absorb some of the dev costs, making a game cheaper for producers--not consumers. That's still OK to a degree if the alternative is $60 games.

Acutally David Mario 64 only sold 1 million in Japan. But it's total worldwide sales were over 11million thanks to the PAL market.

I think Super Mario Bros. 1 actual figures were closer to 15million according to Guiness World Records, but true accurate figures will probably never be available.

Quote

---

Hey guys, remember when Pikmin 2 had tons of advertising? Good times

---

Mc_kids, Skittles, Noid, Cool Spot......

Didn't Pepsi Man have some moderately successful games released in Japan?

Quote

---

Originally posted by: Hostile Creation

Quote

---

Hey guys, remember when Pikmin 2 had tons of advertising? Good times

---

I mean, can't you just imagine kids running out to buy Dannon yogurt and Duracell batteries after playing some Pikmin?

---

Quote

---

Originally posted by: Ian Sane
And who the HELL is going to buy this? Seriously. The general public can be morons at the best of times but there's a limit to how far you can fool them. McDonalds Man isn't going to sell millions of copies.

---