You know people, you're all right, what an unfair price. This story is probably bogus, but seriously you're quite funny. I mean, the Wii doesn't really put anything in its plastic shell. Microsofts got stuff that needs FANS that still can't cut it, Sony's got stuff from TEH FUTURES OUTER SPACE!!1! By comparison Nintendo has practically NO graphics card or anything, right?
Or maybe everyone needs to look beyond the glowing tube to try to measure the expense incurred. I mean what, if not flashing pretty images, accurately represent quality? Because, you know, that gyroscopic technology thats had virtually NO previous consumer level implementation definately wasn't costly in R&D and new process manufacturing & fabrication. Nor the orientation technology, I mean, we've seen crap like that ALL OVER the place.
I would believe it if it this console strains Nintendo more than any previous they've put out. They're just putting their money where it belongs, however, and where nobody else has really bothered to before - the human interface devices, rather than simple processor upgrades.
Let me offer some evidence to this in the form of a quizlet. What are the two consoles, already released or pending release, that arent feasably emulatable?