I mention our internal policy only as a means to clarify; other sites and magazines have different ways of handling previews, sometimes including opinion. We don't. So that's a perfectly reasonable way to respond to your complaint that the preview contained no opinion. You might as well complain that our reviews aren't eight pages long. The reason is that I would not allow such a monstrosity onto the site, the same as I do not allow opinion to intrude upon a preview. Other sites obviously feel differently.
In that you seem to hold Dan's opinion in high regard and thirst for it so powerfully, I'm sure he will be flattered and even more encouraged to write impressions of the game. But I don't know if he will do so. You see, this game has been in development for a long time, and we've played many builds of it, and the fundamental mechanics have not changed much in that time. This event was not like Revolution's unveiling in May -- it's not designed to introduce you to a product and help you get a feel for what it's all about. We know what Hunters is about, and if you have a DS, chances are that you do too. This event was about detailed information of the game's deepest features, many of which are not easily demoed in just a couple of hours, hence our reliance on Nintendo for certain information. Consider, for instance, that Dan missed a good chunk of "free gameplay time" so he could conduct an interview with the developers, which will be posted tonight.
It was my suggestion to use the phrase "hands-on" in the abstract, because Dan did get to play this game for himself at the event, and because some of the information in the preview comes directly from his playing time. There's nothing dishonest or misleading about it. It is a hands-on preview. NOT hands-on impressions.
I try to be very receptive to feedback of all types, and I'm trying to respond directly to your criticism in a timely manner and in the same tone with which we are addressed, within reason. What I'm getting from your comments is that the divide between previews and impressions, to which we adhere fairly strictly, is not always well understood by our readers, particularly people who have not been reading the site for years and years (unlike most of the posters in this thread). And I'm getting the message that people want game impressions to go with previews whenever possible, which is a reasonable request even though you may not always be happy with the results (for instance, if we didn't have enough time with the game to form a solid opinion or make any new observations).